And the number of schools doing so is rising, Romer said -- with even some middle schools considering the tactic. Treatment and prevention should remain the top priority — with or without a complementary drug testing program. This is not only referring to the rights of the students but as well as the right of privacy of parents. Some would feel that it is an absolute invasion of privacy, and it puts a strain against those who may be under medication. Drugs Take Up Greater Time, Energy and Focus: They spend a lot of time using drugs, thinking about it, or recovering from its effects. In addition, drug testing can lead to the discovery of things which are ought to be kept confidential such rare diseases or severe diseases. There are many more luxuries that come with the lifestyle of than even ago.
There are schools that are already implementing random drug tests, seeing the benefits of such a move. The only downfall of this type of test is that it cannot detect substance abuse if the individual has abstained for at least a day prior to collection of urine. It is a sad reality that some individuals may have been denied being among the workforce despite their knowledge and skills. They cite an example where excelling students who actually do drugs at home would be punished for an activity they do outside the campus if drug testing in schools is mandated. There have been several cases where teachers were proven to be abusing drugs in states like Hawaii and West Virginia for example and subsequently arrested.
Delaware Valley School District ruling trumped the federal laws for drug testing in the state. In the last five years, drug testing has become more and more prevalent in schools. It serves as punishment for an activity done outside the campus. In a recent study of U. Around 20 percent of U. In 1998, the ruling was extended to include all extracurricular activities.
As the above data illustrates, the problem of youth gangs in schools demands our attention. By subjecting a young person to testing, even with the student's and parental consent, implies a loss of trust. While detection and the subsequent penalties or any form of acceptable punishment as well as counseling would not guarantee permanent deterrence, it is a step forward and a definitive attempt to deal with the drug problem. A study published in 2007 showed that students who undergo drug testing are still at risk of future drug abuse. List of Cons of Drug Testing in Schools 1. Meanwhile, teenagers who are assessed with the positive drug test will be given the chance to be admitted to a rehabilitation center before everything could be too late. Despite its primary goal centered on assessing and addressing problems of substance and drug abuse among students at schools, opponents claim the opposite result aside from its negative perspective on some ethical issues.
The decision of the court allowed random drug testing for student athletes. Why is it Important to Drug Test in Schools? Cons of Random Drug Testing On the negative side are some of the same things that can be considered positive. A school drug testing program has two purposes: to identify the students who are involved in illegal drug use and to deter substance and drug abuse among students. Drug Abuse by Youth Gangs in Schools One of the scariest things for parents is that their children might use alcohol or drugs. Communities interested in starting student drug testing programs should become familiar with the law in their respective states to ensure proper compliance.
Despite implementing strict regulations and widespread monitoring of these illicit drugs, drug users are able to have access to them and continuously engage with drug use. This detection is crucial if kids indulging in substance abuse have to be identified. Is this the best regulation to pursue at a time when integral programs like music and art are being cut down or out of schools? For example, Mary takes acting classes through a local theater, but isn't part of any sports or other competition-based activities at school. Allen understood the benefits of drug testing, but he also realized it was yet another bill for a school that must keep a close eye on its budget in a cash-strapped state. There are children who need protection and for the most part, public schools, teachers, and educators are doing the best they can with what they have without directly negatively impacting every child for the actions of a few. Students who take drugs are putting themselves at risk of failing and being not able to graduate school.
Most justice systems hold to the notion of innocence until proven guilty. The cost of testing is likely to exceed most schools' entire expenditure on drug education, prevention or counselling. However, any traces of cannabinoids found in a drug test may prohibit an individual from being employed. Individual state constitutions may dictate different legal thresholds for allowing student drug testing. But when concerned parents and faculty turn to testing, it can serve as a way of generating help for the child in need to get treatment and related services. In order for a school to implement a drug testing policy, there must usually be reasonable suspicion that you, as an individual, are using drugs. Privacy Many of those who argue against drug testing in schools cite privacy concerns as a major issue in the debate.
Is it time that the students start understanding the true nature of their personal liberties and do some of these things in school? Unless you are an athlete, the fact that some students may be using drugs may not be enough to allow a public school to drug test you! If there were about 140 tests done and out of those tested only about 4 came back positive, how much of an investment would that be for minimal return? With the advances of drug tests, there is no need to embarrass a child by exposing them to adult supervision at the time they urinate. When it comes to drug testing through government agencies, the real question needs to be addressed as to who is paying for the drug tests. The document would only become public if subpoenaed, the website reports. Supreme Court said student drug testing for adolescents in competitive extracurricular activities is constitutional, does that mean it is legal in my city or state? Several professional athletes have checked positive as steroid users raising concern that teens whose use up until now was almost wholly unnoticed or ignored might be using the drugs to achieve athletic success just as their heroes had been. Earlier in his educational career, he was coaching basketball at a high school in Indiana. The lack of actual evidence means that the teacher's opinion may outweigh what the student has to say. He was not involved with the report, but agreed that random drug testing is largely ineffective.
The survey results which stated the decline of drug abuse among young students is a good sign that slowly, these children are taking care of themselves. Reasonable suspicion may include concrete facts or much more subjective criteria. This means that a student is far more likely to be required to undergo testing than teachers. Thus, it is clear that drug testing is necessary to maintain a safe, drug-free workplace. As an example, person may realize that their drug use is interfering with ability to do their job, is damaging their marriage, making problems worse, or causing health problems, but they continue to use…. And it does not address the reasons why kids turn to drugs in the first place. While it is substantially less expensive than it once was, drug tests, even in bulk will cost money.