Therefore, we are disrespected to God and should not support cloning. At the same time, he believes we must work to better the situation of the poor and marginalized so their access to all therapies is improved. Currently, federal regulations on stem cells are unclear, she argued, making it difficult for universities and other institutions to tell if they are in compliance. That is why, if environmental pollutıon effects a cheetah , actually it effects all type of cheetahes. This is such a fundamental principle that even the most obtuse ought to recognize it. Overall, cloning is lacking the data to support it effectiveness and it remains a risky procedure. Dolly was one of over 200 sheep embryos that scientist tried to clone and hers was the only embryo that survived Kitcher, 1996.
Human cloning would take decades of research and rigorous testing before it would ever be allowed to go through human trials. For instance, if genes are modified to create smarter human beings by means of cloning, average humans, who are not the products of this process, will have no takers. As you can see, I think each and every reason to ban human cloning was logically contradicted or challenged. Human cloning for so-called therapeutic purposes is completely unethical. Cloning animals is very unethical and it is a highly controversial topic.
Theoretically, this might seem fairly straightforward. Even though this process can result in the birth of a clone, it is often only used for producing partially developed organisms with research purposes. We would be killing innocent human lives in the process. Cloning can be described as genetic reproductive technique that results to exact genetic copy of another. This may put us in a threat of getting infected with a serious disease.
Human cloning is far more complicated, with greater risks and potentials for error. The baby that will become a child and further along in life an adult, would be the genetic duplicate of the person from whom the original cell nucleus was taken. Finally, given that most scientists have predicted that human clones would be plagued with undetectable but harmful genetic abnormalities, such abnormalities might also be present in the tissues or cells derived from cloned human embryos. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments. It is dangerous to the clone as shown within this paper but more importantly, it would also be very dangerous for the birth mother as in the cases pertaining to animal testing.
Also, we need to take into consideration that human life isn't clearly defined by medical or legal literature. Cloning is taking a cell from a live creature and using it to produce another creature with the same genetic sequence. Also, until most all the faults of it are figured out, it shouldn't go to human trials. It is a question that a lot of people have been asking around the world after scientists discovered this process. Therefore, using any and all artificial means would be equivalent to cheating. Lots more on about this.
Also, we could find out a lot more about humans if we actually cloned humans and not animals, I mean it seems kinda hypocritical. While evolving a policy on cloning there are several ethical questions that must be considered. Basically boils down to this: God gives you brain and logic, but don't use it. Some argue it is worth the effort and the consequences. Cloning involves a controlled split of the embryo to produce a tailor-made genetic make up. So if society was ready and there are no significant health issues involved, it would have been ethical.
This is was a good experiment in my opinion. Irrespective of whether it is human reproductive cloning or therapeutic cloning, the pros and cons have to be taken into consideration when trying to determine whether the process is safe or not. If we try these hith humans, many human clones will be deformed, born with bad diseases or will miss a leg or an arm. That means the stem cells were obtained from embryos, not eggs. You cannot have so-called therapeutic without reproductive because the technique to make cloned babies is the same as to make a cloned embryo to try to make replacement tissues.
It could teaches how disorders or disease may be created and show us how to reverse them before conditions get worse. However, scientific freedom is not a fundamental right. ~ It helps homosexual and sterile couples to have biological offspring. Another example of such carelessness is in studies done on cows. Written 1998 This article is stupid, your argument is weak. For instance, a country that could clone people could create a massive army that could attempt to take over other countries and lead to endless wars of emotionless men. Contrary to women who assume the risks associated with egg donation in order to undergo in vitro fertilization, women who take such risks for the purpose of research cloning would not be motivated by the desire to have a child, but, oftentimes, by the desire for financial gain.
I view this like I view abortion, the embryo is not a person yet, not technically. If the researchers had obtained stem cells from eggs, it would be process known as parthenogenesis, that is, stimulating the egg to divide. The idea of cloning is repugnant. However, facts are not as supportive towards this claim as scientists may want. Moreover, clones could be used in crime or as weapons. We need to clone humans in order to progress as the human race! In so-called therapeutic cloning, scientists to create a cloned embryo who is then used in research and destroyed. Since genes can be tricky, recessive genes may show up too late in a clone, and a whole line of people may get affected.